Two tables

In a nutshell

In Explain Pain Supercharged, Lorimer Moseley and David Butler proposed The Grand Poobah* Pain Theory. They offered four key statements to describe the GPPT ‘in a nutshell’:

1. Pain is an unpleasant feeling that is felt somewhere in the body and urges us to protect that bodily location.

2. Pain is one of many protective mechanisms. Others include movement, immune, cognitive, endocrine and autonomic.

3. Pain is the only protective mechanism we are necessarily aware of and compels us to do something to protect the painful bit.

4. Pain is modulated by any credible evidence that protection is warranted.

Two tables

And two tables summarising essential ideas around pain and protection and how to talk about them. Table One highlighted the vital difference between pain and nociception. Table Two called out some nonsense terms and offered both scientifically accurate and sensible lay terms as alternatives.

Table 2.1 from Explain Pain Supercharged

Clink to open link with full sized image

Table 2.2 from Explain Pain Supercharged

Clink to open link with full sized image

It is remarkable…

For many reading this, these ideas may be deeply embedded and second nature, but as Lorimer and David reflect in Explain Pain Supercharged:

“It is remarkable that these concepts are yet to be completely adopted within the pain science and clinical community.” (EPS p22)

These four key ideas and two tables will have a place as you Explain Pain to people experiencing problem pain states.

Additionally, as the #painrevolution continues to gain momentum, these fundamentals will also be helpful in the role that is increasingly being taken on by many in this space – that of public advocate for people and pain science.

-NOI Group

 

*‘Pooh-bah’ was coined by Gilbert and Sullivan in The Mikado. There it was used in jest to describe someone who thought themselves the most important in the community. The literary genius of The Flintstones included the Grand Poobah as the leader of a secret society of which Fred and Barney were members. Happy Days carried on the theme and ultimately influenced us to use this term to convey the idea that this is the all-encompassing, most important theory related to Explain Pain Supercharged.

 

2019 NOI Courses Australia and New Zealand

AUCKLAND 15-17 MARCH 2019|EP+GMI *SOLD out*

AUCKLAND 23-24 MARCH 2019|MONIS *Sold out*

ADELAIDE 6-7 APRIL 2019 | MONIS *Sold out*

HOBART  3-5 MAY | EP+ GMI *Last Places*

KINGSCLIFF 14-16  JUNE | EP+GMI

MELBOURNE 5-7 JULY | EP+GMI

NOOSA 2-4 August | EP+GMI

SYDNEY | 23-25 August | EP+GMI *NEW LISTING*

SYDNEY | 24-25 August | MONIS *NEW LISTING*

ALBURY WODONGA | 18 – 20 OCTOBER | EP+ GMI

BRISBANE | 15 – 17 November | EP3 – Moseley, Butler & Vlaeyan

5 Responses to “Two tables”

  1. jqu33431quintner

    I have a few comments, which are made in the spirit of collegiality (that is, we are all in this together).

    Four Key Statements:

    How can a person protect his or her entire body when their chronic pain is felt diffusely?
    “Pain is a mechanism” is problematic. The IASP regards it as an experience.
    “Pain is modulated by any credible evidence that protection is warranted.” What constitutes credible evidence? Do you really mean “threat” in this context?

    Table 2.1

    “Pain is always felt somewhere”. Mrs Gradgrind (a character in “Hard Times” by Charles Dickens) located pain as being felt “somewhere in the room”.

    “A painful stimulus is one that triggers pain”. There is no such thing as a painful stimulus!

    Table 2.2

    “Noxious stimulus OR painful stimulus”. See above.

    Reply
  2. Ronald Kan

    Hi NOIgroupies,
    Thanx for posting. Gives me the opportunity to raise something that puzzels me a long time. Your first statement is “Pain is an unpleasant feeling that is felt somewhere in the body and urges us to protect that bodily location”. Driven by 30 yrs of experience in treatment of people in chronic pain, I think it is justifiable to expand “that bodily location” to “the person”. It’s not only bodily threat but also social (interpersonal) threat (Eisenberger et al) and even intrapersonal threat that may give rise to a protective response i.e. pain. What’s your opinion on this?

    Reply
  3. jqu33431quintner

    Ronald, your suggestion is getting close to our revision of the IASP’s definition of pain: “Pain is a mutually recognizable somatic experience that reflects a person’s apprehension of threat to their bodily or existential integrity.”

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: