What is Graded Motor Imagery?

We’ve just released our latest video. This is in “patient language” and we hope it can be used as an introduction for people considering this treatment approach (and their therapists).

More resources, including the free Graded Motor Imagery poster set at gradedmotorimagery.com and noigroup.com.

– Tim Cocks


8 Responses to “What is Graded Motor Imagery?”

  1. davidbutler0noi

    Thanks for posting this Tim,

    GMI has been an interesting process for us. I have noticed that the take up of GMI has been strongly patient driven, rather than clinician driven. This means that patients and families have become aware of GMI and pushed clinicians to take more notice. The first GMI trials are now 10 years old. Change comes slowly but I think clips like this really help.


  2. Efwef Gwerb

    Hi all,

    I’d like to see a comparison of GMI and body mindfulness training. I think that would be a very meaningful study.

    I say this because I have always had a feeling that GMI works because the 3 exercises train the client to be mindful of the body (directly or indirectly). I feel like the inability to discriminate left/right is simply a symptom of very poor body awareness. The chronically painful body is rejected by the mind, so no wonder it’s hard to tell left from right.

    What do you guys think of that possibility? Reasonable?

    Some good studies on how body awareness (meditation) affects gene expression and inflammation:


    • timcocks0noi

      Hey EG

      Such an important point – as Dave mentions – if only there was the money! I think there has to be a component of becoming more aware of the body in the benefits of GMI. I think Alva Noë’s and Kevin O’Regan’s work may be relevant here – notions of consciousness being something that we ‘do’ through ‘skilled access to the world’, which may be disrupted by injury, pain, altered nervous system function and so on. This is perhaps subtly different from the idea that the “chronically painful body is rejected by the mind” (which implies a mind/body dualism. Also i don’t think ‘bodies’ hurt – people hurt…). Pure speculation, but, perhaps an injury that leads to pain and altered nervous system function leads to a reduction in skilled access to the world – a reduced ability to ‘do’ consciousness and a reduced ability to accurately ‘be in the world’ (after Noë). Again, just speculation on my part having read and Noeë and O’Regan and having sympathy for their views. Unfortunately, neither have said much about pain.

      Not quite what you were asking for, but Lorimer has done some clever work with GMI, trying to tease out the mechanisms of benefit. This RCT, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15733631, varied the order of the GMI stages to determine whether the effects were due to sustained attention to the effected limb (so moving towards to what you are getting at, but not quite “mindfulness” per se). The results demonstrated that the order of GMI was important, suggesting that it was the progressive activation of the pre-motor cortex then motor cortex that imparts the benefit (in patients with CRPS of the upper limb). Speculating again, perhaps this graded activation of the pre-motor and motor cortices retrains skillful access to the world and skillful ‘be’ing and doing consciousness. Why any of this makes people hurt is perhaps an even curlier question!

      As always, great to have your thought provoking ideas and comments to push and extend my thinking.

      • Efwef Gwerb

        Thanks Tim,

        I think that study is very useful. Whilst the underlying mechanisms may relate to attention and re-embodiment, the style and type of attention is obviously important.

        “Everywhere I go, I find a Mosley has been there before me”. Apologies to Freud. ; )


  3. davidbutler0noi

    Hi EG,

    I wish there was research money for all that, but even then there would need to some consensus on what is actually being researched. Re-embodiment is probably the basis of many therapies and the stages of GMI. I find those with mindfulness skills ( and hypnosis, meditation, counselling, coaching etc skills) are really great at the GMI skills especially the explicit motor imagery. I have learnt a lot from skilled psychologists in this field. Someone said to me once during a course demo -“you are doing mindfulness”- “Thanks I said – that will save me going to another course”

    I also think it is the attaching and integration of these re-embodiment strategies to effective education and functional and occupational exposure which is critical.



  4. Efwef Gwerb

    Thanks Dave,

    I have to use that word a bit more… re-embodiment. It’s a good description. I take your point that maybe this is how traditional physical therapies work. Poking someone’s lower back will cause him to pay attention to the area being poked. Attention should automatically translate into embodiment. So long as the stimulus isn’t painful, then the risk of aversion will be minimized. Attention with a negative evaluation would be aggravating to pain.

    For quite a few years I have used non-painful techniques. Lately I have been wondering about the usefulness of provoking some pain (the idea of “P1/P2” useful here) and asking the client to pay careful attention to the pain without judging it as “bad/wrong”. I have to get back to that and give it another run.

    Regards, EG.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: